Native United Kingdom Tribal Casinos: This successful company was established in 2024, and thanks to its innovation and focus on Spin and Win, this casino has grown into a reputable and strong gaming site.
  • Ufapremier Casino No Deposit Bonus 100 Free Spins - Even though deposits are instant, withdrawals can take some time to process.
  • Online Australia Casino No Deposit: We should warn you that things might get hectic for the support team at times, so that you might have to wait in queue until an agent is available but this rarely takes more than a minute or two.
  • Mrgamez free spins

    Interbet Casino No Deposit Bonus 100 Free Spins
    Firstly, there is a x5 wagering requirement.
    Wild West Wins Casino No Deposit Bonus 100 Free Spins
    How do I consistently win at Baccarat.
    As it is mentioned above, the rules are easy-to-learn and the games charm lies in its simplicity.

    Perth vintage slot machines

    Las Vegas Uk Casino Free Bonus Codes
    In addition, access will be denied to the players from the Australia of America.
    Casino No Deposits
    I wouldnt say they are my favourite features ever but they hold the players attention.
    Slot10 Casino No Deposit Bonus Codes For Free Spins 2025

    Supreme Court Rules Poop-Themed Dog Toys Look Too Similar to Jack Daniel’s

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Jack Daniel’s favor on a long-running trademark case on Thursday, according to Reuters. The iconic whiskey distillery had alleged that the maker of a liquor-themed dog toy tarnished the Jack Daniel’s brand by imitating its likeness.

    The decision was unanimous with a 9-0 vote.

    Bad Spaniels, a bottle-shaped dog toy produced by VIP Products LLC, features a black label and text that includes “The Old No. 2 on your Tennessee Carpet” and “43 percent poo by volume.” A small disclaimer on the toy’s packaging clarifies that the product is not affiliated with Jack Daniel Distillery.

    The June 8 Supreme Court ruling reversed a previous verdict by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. A District Court had ruled to protect the Jack Daniel’s trademark in 2018 — a decision that was later appealed by the chew toy manufacturer. In 2020, a lower court ruled that VIP Products LLC’s toys are protected as “expressive work” under the First Amendment. The 9th Circuit said that the dog toy manufacturer did not affect Jack Daniel’s brand image as they had used the Jack Daniel’s trademark “to convey a humorous message.” The distillery brought the case to the U.S. Supreme Court in November 2022, arguing that the toys were not classified as protected speech.

    Several industry organizations filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case, including the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), Beer Institute, Brewers Association, American Distilled Spirits Alliance, American Craft Spirits Association, and Wine Institute.

    This story is a part of VP Pro, our free content platform and newsletter for the drinks industry, covering wine, beer, and liquor — and beyond. Sign up for VP Pro now!

    Source link

    Scroll to Top